Solving Chronic Absenteeism Isn’t ‘One-Size-Fits-All,’ This Leader Says
Source: Education Week | Category: Attendance
Summary: Education Week spotlights a district strategy that treats chronic absence as a set of student-specific barriers—backed by routine data checks and practical, supportive outreach instead of blanket messages.
- National snapshot: roughly 22–23% of U.S. K–12 students were chronically absent in 2024–25 (missing 10%+ of school days).
- From a 2025 RAND survey of 1,300 students (age 12+): top reported reasons included illness (67%), feeling down/anxious (10%), oversleeping (9%), and low interest in attending (7%).
- What the district watches: recurring attendance “check-ins,” early-warning flags (like multiple absences in the first 20 days), and pattern reviews (for example, Monday/Friday spikes).
- How outreach changes: clearer, more empathetic letters that show days missed and what’s typical—paired with quick problem-solving supports (sometimes as small as helping set an alarm routine).
Why this matters for K–12 schools: Chronic absenteeism isn’t a single problem, so one universal tactic rarely moves the needle. A consistent operating cadence—early triggers, supportive contact, and fast barrier removal—can interrupt patterns before they become the norm.
How a Connecticut School Slashed Its Chronic Absenteeism Rate
Source: The 74 | Category: Attendance
Summary: The 74 reports on Ponus Ridge STEAM Academy (Norwalk, CT) and a tightly managed attendance workflow—frequent data review, clear ownership, and quick follow-up—to bring chronic absenteeism down.
- Reported outcome: chronic absenteeism dropped from a post-pandemic peak of 31% to under 10% (9.1% in 2024–25), versus 17.2% districtwide in Norwalk.
- Team routine: an administrator-led group regularly reviews students at risk and adjusts plans as circumstances shift.
- Targeted troubleshooting: if absences cluster around a particular period, the response may include schedule changes or other tailored adjustments.
- Family connection: rapid outreach when a student is marked absent, plus consistent communication to keep families engaged.
Why this matters for K–12 schools: This moves beyond “awareness” to a repeatable system. Standardizing the cadence—who meets, how often, what data gets reviewed, and what actions follow—helps schools shift from reactive calls to proactive prevention.
Rising Mental Health Costs Leave Too Many Children Behind. Schools Can Help
Source: The 74 | Category: Mental Health
Summary: This piece argues that as youth behavioral health gets more expensive and harder to access, schools increasingly become the “front door” for support—reducing friction for families and reaching students earlier.
- Data cited (UCSF summary): youth behavioral health costs nearly doubled from 2011 to 2022 and represent ~40% of total U.S. child health spending.
- Why schools help access: school-based services can bypass common barriers like transportation, time off work, provider navigation, and long waitlists.
- Example cited (Chicago K–8): 28% of students receive school-based mental health services, supported through partners and multiple full-time social workers.
- Durability problem: without stable public funding and workable reimbursement pathways, schools face real tradeoffs between academics and mental health staffing.
Why this matters for K–12 schools: Cost and access evidence can strengthen the case for staffing models and community partnerships—and for planning past one-time grants. It also elevates financing readiness (including Medicaid billing) so supports don’t compete with classroom dollars.
I Teach in a Tech-Powered System That Never Sleeps — and My Students Feel the Cost
Source: EdSurge | Category: School Climate
Summary: A technology director reflects on how “always-on” school platforms—grades, assignments, dashboards, and messaging—can heighten stress for students who are still building attention and emotional regulation skills.
- Core concern: constant visibility and rapid feedback can increase comparison and pressure, leaving less “pause” time that supports learning.
- Reality check: schools depend on tech for core routines (LMS, testing, translation/accessibility) and sometimes safety (visitor systems, alerts, monitoring tools).
- AI is becoming embedded (translation, text-to-speech, writing scaffolds), while student confidence in tools can outpace their understanding of limits.
- Suggested direction: slow down rollouts, protect “breathing room” in learning, and invest in staff capacity and relationships alongside new tools.
Why this matters for K–12 schools: Technology can expand access, but districts may need guardrails around pace—notification norms, response-time expectations, and assessment cadence—so urgency doesn’t define the climate. Pairing tech decisions with digital wellbeing routines can reduce unintended pressure on students and staff.
Lawsuits Test New Legal Theories About What Causes Social Media Addiction
Source: EdSurge | Category: Other
Summary: EdSurge explains how lawsuits against social media companies are increasingly centered on product design—algorithms and engagement mechanics—arguing those features drive addictive use and related harms, beyond disputes about user content.
- A bellwether trial this month is framed as a test case that could shape how thousands of claims move forward.
- School district cases have been consolidated in the Northern District of California; arguments are expected to begin this summer.
- Key questions include causation (linking design features to harm) and how Section 230 applies when claims target product mechanics rather than content.
- Districts argue they are shifting resources away from instruction to address mental health and attention impacts tied to heavy social media use.
Why this matters for K–12 schools: Even ahead of rulings, the direction of these cases is influencing policy debates about phones and student wellbeing. Districts can clarify device norms, strengthen digital citizenship, and ensure tiered supports are ready for students struggling with anxiety, sleep disruption, and attention challenges.
Policymakers are Looking to Cut Down Kids’ Screen Time. Ed Tech Could Be Included in That.
Source: Education Week Market Brief | Category: Other
Summary: This Market Brief argues that “screen time” concerns are expanding beyond social media—and instructional technology could get swept in unless districts clearly communicate purpose, guardrails, and evidence for classroom use.
- Core tension: broad consumer “screen time” debates can lump instructional and accessibility tools together with entertainment and social platforms.
- Ed-tech leaders argue districts should clearly separate learning-oriented use cases from engagement-driven feeds.
- Common differentiators highlighted: student privacy/data safeguards, accessibility requirements, evidence expectations tied to funding, and procurement standards (cybersecurity/data management).
Why this matters for K–12 schools: Boards and families may ask districts to justify what screens are used for and how schools prevent harm. A clear framework—purpose, privacy, accessibility, evidence, and healthy-use norms—helps protect high-value learning uses while addressing wellbeing concerns.
Want to Try Alongside?
Sign up for our free demo in just 30 seconds.
Join LeadWell
Sign up for timely resources delivered to your inbox twice a month